"Night feet-zone.com fishing in antibodies. " Pablo picasso (1939).
Abstract: complementation is advanced as an improvement in the ruling paradigm in psychology. It is defined as the return of libido (mental energy to a relatively unconscious state focused on spirituality. This corresponds to the practice of “not celebrities” in the contemplative tradition of negative theology (“through the negative”). Unilateral attention feet-zone.com to unconscious integration has harmful consequences, since it is expected that the libido is expected that libido it will be when you do not use it in a conscious direction. Finally, this becomes an obstacle to the path of individual. The answer of karl jung is criticized from this position. There are also destructive consequences for society, when the idea of rapprochement and integrity manifest as cultural radicalism and integrity and integrity and integrity. Neo-marxist ideology. The embodiment is the theological analogue of integration. This is balanced by the glorification of god, which is equally necessary. The religious victim serves the spirit. Psychology should pay much attention to the unconscious replenishment. The complementation is associated with the practice of the mystical tradition, central, where the elevated habits and social removing. Saint -anselm, atonement of satisfaction, sexual cult, book of job. Bloody business. The severed limbs and the head of the gods gave rise to everything that we see. In psychological terms, unconscious archetypes sacrifice themselves for the revival and prosperity of the conscious world. This is the main motive in the history of religion, here it belongs to the victim and death of the deity. However, in pagan theology, humanity also makes a payback like atonement. This returns life to the gods, which is equally important. This is a blood victim. In christian mythology, the son of god sacrifices himself for the sake of mankind, while the human offspring sacrifices himself to god. He carries out his work in both directions.
The victim in the latest trinitarian [1] terms based on the same basic idea that is in pagan culture. This is a compensation that serves to ensure the divine sphere of vital force. In our era, this affects the practice of religious in order to devote conscious time and strength to serving god. Relying for prayer, contemplation and pious works, the student sacrifices his conscious energy to an unconscious spirit. The individual, to some extent, becomes a recluse. Jungian psychology, however, has no theory around it, but has a tendency to consider the unconscious as a mural capable of creating an endless crop. This is the result of the fact that karl jung rejects the trinity replacing them of their quarters. Sometimes the connection between worldly and divine corresponds to a conscious attitude. Incarnation means the embodiment of the spirit in daytime reality. Integration has a similar meaning, because a porn-leaf means the appearance of unconscious content: in the spotlight. Since the divine and unconscious spheres represent the “great unknown”, they are partially overlapping spheres. The modernized trinitarian psychological theory will serve to supplement the old trinitarian mystical theology. I proposed the term “complementation” for this slow process, which helps a soft, conscious focus, symbolically represented by an alchemical circular distillation and transformation in a vessel. Although jung's work on alchemy can thank a lot, he misunderstood the symbol of the ship. The process serves more purpose than from year to year integration with consciousness. As a historical example, complementation corresponds to the use of divine sparks or mental fragments, borborian gnostik, for subsequent transportation to the super -vertebral sphere. The borborians decided to eat some disgusting substance - a practice that brought them the name borborian or "dirty." Doing this, they believed that they collected scattered shower fragments to give them, finally, to the heavenly world (cf. Walker, 1983, p. 129).
It is also possible for a modern person to carry out sacrificed work in accordance with such lines (not falling to the illness of the specification and food of dirt). Scantilles (sparks), in reality, are visible to the eye of the mind. When the spirit dissipates around the world, it is recognized, it is absorbed. This will replenish the spiritual unconscious, causing circular distillation. In alchemical symbols, early morning precipitation corresponds to mental regulars, which remained behind the production of peace. The intensive activity will contribute to the appearance of a living creature of pure gold. It is noteworthy that the new practical alchemists understand this in a specific way. They use specialized equipment to collect morning dew in the grass. Obviously, an improved psychological understanding will be needed to complete the picture.The concrete understanding is not completely wrong, but the anxiety is simply ritual and therefore not too high quality. Unconscious, in terms of mythological goods and supporting patients. Nevertheless, it was the expectation of jung that his ideas would form further beyond that and what a clear involvement in the world would provide. He said after his life that he was disappointed with his achievement. Jungian psychology did not gain fame in academic circles, and at the same time it did not become an important discipline for spiritual growth. The movement of yungian survived the decay to load. I believe that introversion was incorrectly applied as an instrument of individual. [2] alchemy, along with it, its terms, for example, round distillation, is generally incorrectly interpreted. He deprived the yungians of the most precious instrument allotted by the unconscious. At the same time, a romantic vein in jungian psychology grew to a strong storm in archetypal psychology. Philosophical speculations caused an unscientific metaphysics around synchronism and psychoid archetype, which makes jungian psychology forever alienated from science. Jung accepted the negative knowledge of the trinity and trinitarian mystical theology, while the drug overestimated the “quaternary worldview” and its pagan connotations. Jung also developed a complex regarding contemporary art, which he considered “painful” (cf. Voitkovsky, 2009, here).
The ambitious concept of jung is the great, in which i [3 [3 [3 [3 [3 [3 [3 [3 [3 [3 [3] [3] covers all opposites. The individual should not leave the world, but should be removed with opposites. This is a heroic concept, since it provides for ongoing cooperation with unconscious archetypes. To come to terms with such complex psychological problems, we can use the wisdom of the unconscious. Dreams are so entertaining. The next “alchemical” dream, for a start of twenty, it seems that i now consider jungian’s incorrect interpretation:
The dream goes against the grain of jungian psychology, since the brew was alone in the dark. There is no need for intervention of consciousness. The conscious mind initiates the process, has been waiting for a long time, sinks and brings brew when it is ready. In addition, it rotates around something very tiny; just an influx of red elixir. This represents an alchemical "circular distillation." During sleep, the dwarf approached and was said: “it is better to be a small source of the fountain, which breaks the water than to be a big source, the source of which is exhausted by the approach to the company as a large fountain, which covers all the opposites, including a worldly career. At the same time, he did not indulge in the jungian look at the location of the unconscious, namely, as a heroic struggle. Since this represents my personal equation, it does not always get an attitude to each people. But my priority to argue that jungian psychology is largely built by jung’s personal equation, which led to partial incorrectly the interpretation of the psyche. This is not entirely wrong, but this is not the whole truth. Jung’s psychology focuses on a salary fountain, but forgets about a small fountain. This explains why he was not able to evaluate contemporary art, which undoubtedly belongs to the trinitarian secret of transcendence. In fact, jung closed his forces in a small apartment, where building materials painted a little awkward texts and made paintings that were not in artistic value. He also built locks in the sand. Thus, he seemed to indicate the path to a small fountain in his abilities. The problem is that he interprets such activities for us in huge terms as archetypal “original experience”. His metaphysical tendency has entered into the possession in what situations he suggested about his experience. This is most obvious in its view of the mandala, which means to him the totality of life and depicts the architecture of the psyche. Drawing them, it covers life phenomena and turns the rollers into integrity, esoteric practice with a pronounced effect on a person, which will also have a synchronous (divine random) effect. This is superhookh. As obvious from his own autobiography, he fought with unconscious perseverance, that such a mandala was “simple art” (cf. Jung, 1989, chap. 6).
The mandala symbolizes a small fountain, which works as a salvation from life's encumbrance. This is a loophole in an alternative transcendental world, far from our conscious obsessive ideas. When jung was looking for a shelter in a small room under the stairs, he spent temporary losses on incubation in a small world, "which is discreetly and modest. The desired place was distant from the great universe and its conscious feelings, including the jungian principles of the stages of individual. During this time, the elixir is allowed to quietly cook in the unconscious.“The smallest of a spark” (scintillulae) that are collected as part of the current process is its own spirit.
The fundamental jungian principles should be corrected in these issues, supplemented with sound and a modernized psychological version of the trinitarian mystical theology. He will not only receive scientific respectability in the gaze of academic circles, and also help to solve the spiritual disappointment that i feel in critics of jungian psychology. Perhaps the emphasis on integration can lead to a blocking of individual. Jung also had a passion for the thematic topics of the enemy, oppositionist complexio, etc. (See henderson, 2010, here). Jungian self is a complete fountain that extends to all opposites. Ultimately, jung fixed his eyes on the unconscious, and he tells regard to what he had seen. In fact, self -awareness in such a compensatory form, because the conscious angle of view of jung is “differentiation”. To be a person, it is supposed to cut absolutely everything that does not belong to the personality. On the other hand, when the topics of integration and the self -fullness increase as ideals, it is necessary that differentiation is disrupted. This causes a similar problem as in christianity, namely the hypocritical form of imitatio christie. There is a tendency to imitate the ideals of a full person who integrated the nature of the opposite gender in its strength and is equally actively involved in the world on active imagination. This is completely incorrect integration - this is a ritual imitation, which is an additional plus of religion.
Pagan sacrifice
The sacrifice served as a means of liberation the spirit. There is no doubt that if someone is killed, his spirit is liberated and goes to heaven. This means that something important was removed from earthly being, and was given to the kingdom of heaven. Gentiles also sacrificed beautiful objects, such as decorated gold shields. To free their spirit, they “killed” these unique objects, breaking them in half. The victims, as a rule, were beautifully decorated, resemble royal regalia and were often specialized in the same task of the victim. During the iron age in sweden, it was a common practice to sacrifice swords (very valuable goods), throwing them into sacred swamps. During the sacrificial action, the swords were broken. In pagan mythology, god experiences “death” or a severe decrease if he enters into earthly existence. This means that the spirit gives its autonomy, since it is chained to earthly reality. When god took human flesh on his own, from his position it was equal to severe debut and restriction. God sacrificed himself, becoming a man, which means that a huge good, it was provided to humanity. Still, humanity is obliged to support the spiritual world, otherwise things are going badly. As divine subjects, our responsibility is hidden in the fact that the unconscious spirit retains its autonomy. It is necessary, so that a constant devoted practice was supported as a victim. In order to make up for the great gifts that are provided to humanity, we are forced to take responsibility for the divine sphere, as these are a very risky circumstances when it is subjected to depletion. Spiritual beer must continue to boil in the unconscious. The stronger the gifts received, the more acute the victim topic. A mythical mirror worldview applies to the fact that conscious implementation means plunder or possibly death from the point of view of the unconscious. This is the real meaning of the repeated motive of the dying god (cf. Winther, 2009, here).
The sacrifice of god to say that sin is removed from humanity, since we should not be observed in the darkness more. Sin means “be bored by the goal and develop inept. Humanity is no longer inept, but a remarkable ability developed in a number of relations. Jesus, in turn, decided to take a sin from god, which means that god is restored into glory. In the wording of st. Anselm (c. 1033-1109), the sacrifice of christ repays god for the “lost honor”, which means the loss of moral vitality (cf. Wiki, here). Jesus dies as the worst sinners, in the image with adam. He remained exalted until the actual glory, ever appointed by a living being, having received the gifts of clear maturity, which almost no one acquired, because he was freed from initial sin. Nevertheless, he sacrifices his royal regalia. A similar concept of double salvation is perfectly familiar in pagan theology. Indra and shiva should go down to the land to bake their sin. Taking into earthly existence, they eliminate the sin of the world. However, at the same time, their fans take part in the transfer of their own merits to the gods so that you can resume your vitality (cf. Doniger, 1980, p. 141ff).From the standpoint of the gods, in order to restore vitality (in other words, to remove the divine sin) means the restoration of autonomy so that the tool themselves can continue their lives in a spiritual monastery, from afar from the earth. The ransom, so, works in both directions. According to this logic, the stronger the gifts we received in life (especially the gifts of personality, one of which belongs to the intelligence), the stronger the sacrificial impulse is. We must atone for god, because he gave us such a great sacrifice - he suppressed himself and abandoned his autonomy for us. The ancients knew this; at the same time, we lost this understanding, something that implies a catastrophe. The modern version should be reliable, like jesus, and give money to the poor (despite the fact that jesus did not give money to the poor). This summarizes the identification with god, since it imitates god's action, in the elimination of the sinfulness of the world through his embodiment. Against this, traditional asceticism means the transfer of one’s own merit to god, that is, to fulfill the victim of their own life for the good of the spirit. Thus, the ascetic performs his shoulders the burden of divine sin and, as well as simon from cyrena, helps jesus to carry a cross. Thus, imitatio christie, in her right -wing form, is equal to the victim of the gentiles, namely to send merits to god, but not to humanity. Modern christians, but only want to delete the sin of the world. At the same time, so much divine kindness was already given to humanity, however, god longs for redemption as a result of his great sacrifice. That is why religion in the modern era often opposes the spiritual path. Of course, from the jungian position it is easy to understand what to pretend to be good leads to the accumulation of shadow [4] with terribly evil consequences. The unconscious becomes the sick and abundant of sin. But he rejects the idea that our company should carry the sin of god - in psychological terms - contribute to the autonomy of the archetypal sphere. Nevertheless, this can be achieved only because of the redeeming work, which includes the victim in its forces. The main shadow problem really rotates around the shadow of god. In the case when the individual intends to get a much larger vital water from the living god (which jung equates to the unconscious), the shadow of the probel appears more and more. In fact, jung and m-von franz had information about the fact that home doors should not recharge the unconscious. They realized that it makes sense to remain moderately unconscious, although they have never theorized around this. This theoretical one -sidedness gave rise to the egological psychology of edward f. Edingra (cf. Winter, 1999, here). The use of narcotic substances or “profane spirituality” also remains a means of reloading the unconscious.
Jung does not at all plunge into this very serious aspect of our culture, that is, the sacrifice of the gods. Only the victim of the gods was important in his eyes. Like modern christians, he tends to see the divine sphere (unconscious) as an eternal cornucolism. Although in a moral sense this is not a call for moral meaning, he considered this this in the following sense. In the assimilation of jung, the responsibility of a person is reduced to excavate the unconscious and deprive him of goods. In this regard, he is a completely modern capitalist entrepreneur. He sees christ as a symbol of the self, denoting integrity. However, he closes his eyes to another aspect, that is, with jesus as the most miserable creature on our planet, which will be needed, except for the whole and worthy. He is a poor little man forced to sacrifice his great dignity in god and he dies a sinner. Born in the highest glory, soon appointed man, he dies a broken and painful person, subject to contempt and ridicule. He ensured the role of an idiot and a loser, torn to exist on our land, his divine genius is completely sacrificed.
In isaiah (suffering and glory of the servant, chap. 52-53) is depicted by a righteous person, very elevated, but "disfigured beyond the framework of each viewer, and his design is overshadowed outside the human resemblance." It was the will of the lord in order to crush him and force him to suffer, to equip his being by the offer of sin. In particular, due to the exalted righteousness of the servant, he will bear the sin of god. This is a divine transfer of sin. The victim of atonement allows god to restore vitality, the transfer of “sin”, transferred by the divine. The idea that the servant makes intercession and carries the sin of many means that its use decided to take on a divine sin instead of others. This gives others a chance to be released. The book of things around this very topic. Also, christ is overshadowed outside human similarity. He is his own life as a ransom for a series (cf. Mark 10:45). How do these human qualities correspond to an archetype of personality? Who developed his